The Southern Californian newspaper, a new journal, reprinted a report of the Grand Jury in its 16 November 1854, in which it stated that the jail was filthy and was in desperate need of cleaning.
A colorful and ironic description from the Southern Californian about the Los Angeles city jail, 1 March 1855. Click on any image to see them in enlarged views in a new window. |
scorning to squander their time in ignoble activity, and perhaps believing that a more thorough ventilation of their boarding house, would add to its attractions, proceeded on the night of the 22nd, to excavate a neat opening in the wall, something over a foot square, through which upon second thought they concluded to take French leave, and at last accounts had not returned.Mayor Stephen C. Foster, then, according to this account, "not appreciating the ventilation system . . . proceeded to close up the hole, in the usual style of fastening the stable after the colts are stolen." The paper noted that, "very fortunately the county criminals were confined in the upper story, and had no opportunity of participating in the closing excercises of the Anniversary, so dear to the sons of freedom," this last reference being to Washington's birthday.
A little over a year later, another unsavory aspect of the jail came to light when the Star, on 17 May 1856, reported that county prisoner José Dominguez, died in the facility, becoming the second such case recently. Dominguez, who was found guilty of Grand Larceny in the District Court in early January, was sentenced to five months' imprisonment, so it appears he was only a couple of weeks away from release when he died of "bilious fever." The paper observed that
it is quite certain that our jail is not a suitable place for a man who is very sick. There should be a room built in connection with it for sick persons: this is required for humanity's sake. The laws contemplrate punishment—this is most true; but not slow torture to death.
The death of county prisoner José Dominguez as reported in the Star, 17 May 1856. |
Another year-and-a-half went by before news of the jail's condition were discussed, but this time it was to report a rare example of improvement. The Star of 14 November 1857 noted that "a great improvement has also been made in the County Buildings. A brick pavement has been laid down in front, a substantial fence put up, and the court-house and jail, with the public offices, thoroughly repaired and cleaned."
Two months later, in its 30 January 1858 edition, the paper's editor, Henry Hamilton, visited the jail and was given a tour by jailer Joseph H. Smith. Hamilton noted the recent changes, noting that "the yard is neat and clean" and added that shrubs were planted "which will prove ornamental and tend to relieve the harsh outline incidental to the narrow enclosure" of the adobe.
Hamilton went on to give the most detailed description we have of the jail, observing that the first floor section for the city had two rooms for the separation of men and women, with "the occupants of the latter, we need scarcely say, being of the 'bow and arrow' tribe." There were, however, no beds and inmates "may select a soft spot in the earthen floor to sleep off a 'drunk," although "the jailer does his duty in keeping the apartments clean."
As for the county jail on the second floor, matters were quite different, including its security. Hamilton stated that "the joists which support the floor are traversed with strong iron bars throughout, about six inches apart. Over these is laid down thick planking, then a covering of sheet iron, and over all plank again, forming a floor which it would be impossible to cut through without detection."
Noting that this space was "well ventilated," Hamilton stated that there were six cells in the large room, but that they were deficient in not being as airy. As for their strength, "the partitions are made of heavy timber, well secured by iron cramps [clamps?]. The doors are massive iron gratings. Altogether, the great necessity of strength and security is thoroughly attained—such a thing as a prisoner making his escape being almost, we should say, an impossibility."
Smith was given high praise by the Star's publisher for making many improvements and "at his own cost in many cases, [he has been] exceeding the stipend allowed for their [the prisoners'] maintenance." It was said that the cells were inspected twice daily "and the apartments are kept scrupulously clean."
The 30 January 1858 issue of the Star features the best-known description of the Los Angeles city and county jail. |
Despite further praise for Smith who was denoted "an active and efficient officer," the paper concluded that
we consider the prison building, however, unfit for the purpose for which it is used, although, under present circumstances, it would not be advisable to incur the expense of erecting a suitable one.This appears to refer to the depressed local economy, affected by the end of the Gold Rush, the glut in the cattle market, and the national depression of 1857. Other posts on this blog have noted the difficulty, during the same period, in getting funds to build a court house, so the idea of securing a better jail was not in the offing.
More disturbing and warranting action by the Board of Supervisors, was that
the great defect in the cells is the want of light and ventilation. To be confined in one of these dungeons in hot weather must itself be a torture. There is a defect in the management, and a serious one, which we may notice here—it is, the want of clothing for the prisoners. Men are committed to prison, and kept there for months, who have no change of clothing.
In its 13 February 1858 edition, El Clamor Público discussed the poor condition of the Rocha Adobe as the county building by stating that "the jail is a better space than this." |
As bad as these conditions were, it only got worse as the early sixties dawned--this is the subject of the next post!
No comments:
Post a Comment